The Doongalla Estate: A Vanished Mountain Retreat

Brett Allen • April 7, 2025

Like my father, I attended The Basin Primary School in Melbourne’s far east. Nestled at the foot of Corhanwarrabul (Mt Dandenong). An amazing place to grow up, BMX bike riding through the bush, creeks to explore, and looming summer threats of bushfire. The primary school had four ‘houses’ named after local settler homes: Miller, Chandler, Ferndale and my house, Doongalla. I have vague memories of what we were told about each house, one thing I remember was the Doongalla Estate being destroyed in the Black Friday.

In later years, we would venture up to the site where only retaining walls and a set of steps remain. Remnants of the garden, like old European trees, still survived. The open space cut into the bush also had a vista over Naam (Melbourne). In the 1980s, there was no mention of the house’s name coming from the original custodians of the land, the Wurundjeri and Bunurong people of the Kulin Nation. The whitewashed history of the area is likely where my interest in place heritage was born. So, 40 years later, I can reflect differently on Doongalla Estate and its relationship with the community. This is what I have discovered so far.

The Doongalla Forest Reserve of 279 hectares, situated on the western slopes of Mt Dandenong, now occupies land once selected between 1885 and 1893 by Samuel Collier, J. Barnes, J. Jackson and the Bruce brothers. The estate reaches from 152m to 268m above sea level, topping out at Mt Corhanwarrabul (also known as Burke’s Lookout). In 1889, the Bruce brothers erected a Swiss-style chalet on land purchased from Collier. That property was acquired in 1891 by Sir Matthew Davies, who also bought the surrounding lots. Following flood damage to the original chalet, Davies demolished it and in 1892 constructed a new mansion—originally named “Invermay”—at an estimated cost of £35,000. Materials were hauled up Kerrs Lane (now Pig Lane) by tramway using horses and bullocks.

The new house, consisting of 32 rooms including cellars, servant quarters, and stables, was lavish in both design and detail. It featured a central courtyard and was built with high-quality Croydon bricks, slate roofing, exposed Oregon beams, and panelling in Kauri, silky oak, and Blackwood. One room was decorated with French tiles screwed into timber boards. A swimming pool fed by a nearby creek added to the estate’s luxury. Doongalla became known as a weekend haven for Melbourne’s wealthy. Guests enjoyed house parties, fine food, wine, and even moonlit swims. Recitations by Harry Chandler were a social highlight. Sir Matthew Davies was a significant figure in Victoria’s land boom era, creating a complex web of over 30 companies to speculate in land. His empire collapsed during the 1890s economic crash, leaving him bankrupt with £250,000 in debts. The Bank of New South Wales took over Doongalla and installed a caretaker.

In 1908, the estate was purchased by Miss Helen Simson of Toorak, who renamed it Doongalla—a contraction of the Aboriginal term “Doutta Galla,” often interpreted as “Place of Peace.” The name also refers to Dutigalla, wife of Jika Jika, a figure in early Melbourne colonial records. Under Simson’s ownership, extensive renovations took place, including building new staff quarters, fencing, elaborate gardens, and infrastructure upgrades such as a water scheme and electricity. Miss Simson employed workers at high wages and supported local infrastructure and community projects. She died in 1912, and her 15-year-old niece inherited the estate, managed by her father L.K.S. McKinnon, a prominent racing identity. After the niece’s death in 1922, the estate passed to T.M. Burke, who envisioned a golf course and donated land for Burke’s Lookout.

In 1932, fire swept toward the estate. Despite good clearance and a water supply, a windborne ember likely ignited the roof. Locals, including Fergus Chandler and the Dobson family, attempted to fight the fire but were forced to watch the mansion burn. Only the servant quarters and 13 chimneys remained. From 1934, parts of the land were sold and subdivided. The remaining 279 hectares were sold to the Smith Brothers in 1935, who established a timber mill. A controversial Forest Commission pamphlet once blamed the brothers for environmental degradation, but this was later retracted after Roy Smith demanded an apology. Ownership changed again in 1940, and in the 1950s the Victorian Government acquired the land following conservation campaigns, particularly one led by Sir Gilbert Chandler. The stables were later demolished, but the servant quarters remain in use by the park warden.

Today, the former site of the mansion features picnic areas, lawn terraces, garden remnants, and interpretive tracks such as the Collier Walk, Chandler Walk, and Lawrence Walk—each commemorating early settlers and local figures. The name “Doongalla” is thought to derive from an Aboriginal word, possibly meaning “close to water” or alluding to the mist-shrouded landscape typical of the Dandenong Ranges. While the exact linguistic origins remain unclear, the choice of name underscores the common 19th-century practice of drawing on Indigenous languages to evoke a romanticised vision of the Australian landscape, often without proper attribution or understanding of cultural significance.

This superficial borrowing of language without consultation or understanding contributes to a broader pattern of cultural erasure. While settlers named their estates with Aboriginal words, the lives, knowledge systems, and presence of the First Nations peoples who had stewarded those landscapes for tens of thousands of years were marginalised and obscured. The Doongalla Estate, like many colonial properties, sits atop a deeper cultural landscape—one shaped by the Wurundjeri and Bunurong people, who maintained intricate relationships with the land through seasonal knowledge, fire management practices, and spiritual connection. This land was never ceded.

Today, the Doongalla Forest Reserve, now part of the Dandenong Ranges National Park, remains a favourite destination for hikers and history enthusiasts. Traces of the estate—such as exotic trees not native to the region, old garden beds, stone retaining walls, and staircases—emerge subtly from the undergrowth, reminders of an era when colonial wealth carved stately homes into the landscape. The area’s walking tracks, such as the Doongalla Homestead Site Track and the Fireline Track, offer natural beauty and a contemplative connection to the site’s layered past. Interpretive signage gives visitors glimpses into the estate’s story, fostering an appreciation for the fragility of built heritage and natural ecosystems in fire-prone landscapes.

While the mansion is gone, Doongalla’s legacy endures in the memories embedded in the land—a story of ambition, collapse, recreation, and resilience etched into the forested hills of the Dandenongs. Yet within that legacy is an opportunity to confront and reframe history: to acknowledge the silences in the colonial record, to respect the enduring custodianship of the Wurundjeri and Bunurong peoples, and to imagine how landscapes like this might hold space for multiple, interwoven narratives of belonging and memory.

For me, it is a point of reflection of memories of place within my own life. The area is my place, my Country, where stories and experiences shape who I am today. I lived metres away from the Miller’s Homestead, which had a similar colonial settler history. I really do regret that I grew up in an era that was still neglecting First Nations history, especially in such a rich environment. All I can do now is try to discover some of that history myself. Doongalla and its stories can help do that by linking my cultural heritage to those who first took care of the space. But we must be open to hearing the harmful, even horror, stories that it may reveal.

By Brett Allen March 28, 2026
Learning to See Organisations Differently
By Brett Allen March 25, 2026
I cannot remember the name of the small eucalyptus purchased on sale from Bunnings. That seems important now, though it mattered less when I planted it. At the time, it was a small tree placed in the far corner of the garden with a fairly simple intention. I wanted to feed the New Holland honeyeaters that regularly moved through the yard. They were already part of the garden’s rhythm, arriving in quick bursts, calling sharply, disappearing again into the shrubs and fences and neighbouring trees. Planting the eucalyptus felt like a small act of welcome. A gesture of provision. Ten years later, the tree is about five metres tall and covered in small pink flowers. It has become something other than what I imagined. The New Holland honeyeaters do visit it. In that sense, the plan worked. But the tree was never only theirs. Wattlebirds arrive with their rougher, more assertive presence. Other honeyeaters come through too, drawn by nectar and movement. Superb fairy-wrens dart in and out of the lower branches, not for the flowers exactly, but for the insects that the flowers attract. In the evening, a ringtail possum and its joeys visit the tree, moving through it with a different tempo altogether. Occasionally, a grey-headed flying fox arrives from the new local colony, an animal not always welcomed by nearby fruit growers, but here, in this garden, it appears as part of the same wider set of relations. It is welcome here. The tree has become a meeting point. Not a symbolic one only, but a practical one. A place where nectar, insects, shelter, shade, habit, hunger and timing gather together. What began as a planted object has become a small ecological field. Its meaning is not held in the tree alone, but in the relations that form around it. The tree is not simply “in” the garden. It is helping make the garden into a different kind of place. The tree has also changed how the garden sounds. In the afternoons, corellas, galahs and cockatoos pass overhead, sometimes unseen at first, announced by their calls before their bodies appear above the roofline. Their sound belongs to the wider suburb rather than only to the backyard. It comes from above, across fences, roads, powerlines and the remnant trees that still hold the memory of a much larger habitat. Their calls are not background noise. They are a reminder that the garden sits inside a larger aerial world, one that birds read and use in ways I can only partly understand. Closer in, the rainbow lorikeets arrive with less subtlety. They are bossy, bright and possessive, turning the flowering tree into a noisy argument over nectar. They do not simply feed. They claim, chase, scold and return. Their colour almost feels too vivid for the garden's muted greens and greys, yet they belong completely to it. The eastern and crimson rosellas are different. They feel more delicate, more occasional. I mostly see them when the tree is in flower, as if the pink blossoms briefly open a door through which they re-enter the backyard. The hammock sits close to the lemon tree, so the garden is not only eucalyptus blossom and bird movement. There is citrus in the air too, especially when the leaves are brushed or the weather is warm. The smell is sharp, clean and slightly oily, mixing with the softer scent of flowering gum, damp soil, dry mulch and the faint sweetness of nectar. After rain, the garden smells heavier. The eucalyptus leaves release that familiar resinous scent, while the lemon tree cuts through it with something brighter. It is a smell of domestic care and wild visitation at once. From the hammock, the backyard is never silent. There is the high chatter of honeyeaters, the scratch and shuffle of small birds in the foliage, the sudden wingbeat of lorikeets arriving too fast, the rasp of wattlebirds, the thin contact calls of fairy-wrens, and the overhead clamour of parrots moving through the afternoon. The ding-ding of a crimson rosella in another nearby tree. My attempts to mimic the sound are met with a harsh chatter. In the evening, the sound changes again. The birds withdraw. Possums begin their quieter work in the branches. Leaves move without wind. The garden becomes less visual and more textural. I wander to the corner with my torch to say hello to the possumn and to curse it eating my roses as well, but it is welcome in this tree. This is where the anthropological view becomes useful. It asks me not to see the backyard as a private domestic space occupied by a few visiting animals, but as a shared and negotiated environment. The animals are not decorations added to human life. They are participants in the making of place. They arrive with their own needs, patterns and risks. They move through fences, property lines and human intentions without much concern for the categories we place around them. The backyard, then, is not only a garden. It is a habitat, corridor, feeding site, refuge, territory and threshold. Sitting in the hammock beneath the flowering eucalyptus, close to the lemon leaves, close to the birdbath, I become aware that care is often less grand than we imagine. It is not always rescue, intervention or expertise. Sometimes it is water in the birdbath, filled daily. Sometimes it is planting for a flower that will open in another season. Sometimes it is learning to sit still long enough to notice who comes, when they come, and what they do once they arrive. The first tree was planted for a single species, but it has taught me to think beyond that single-species intention. The New Holland honeyeaters were the beginning of the relationship, not its limit. The tree has drawn me into a wider multispecies awareness, where care becomes less about choosing one animal to help and more about creating conditions in which many forms of life can pass through, feed, shelter, rest and return. There is also a lesson in time. Ten years is a long time in the life of a garden, but not such a long time in the life of a tree. The eucalyptus has grown slowly into significance. Its current flowering is not just a seasonal event, but the result of a decade of waiting, weather, soil, roots and repeated visits. The garden remembers through growth. Relationships take shape through recurrence. The birds know the tree now. The possums know it. The insects know it. The flying foxes may know it only occasionally, but even that occasional visit matters. I sit beneath it and think about what it means to share an urban space with animals whose lives are often made difficult by the very environments we have built. A backyard cannot undo habitat loss. A flowering tree cannot resolve the conflicts between flying foxes and fruit growers, or between urban expansion and the animals displaced by it. But it can still matter. It can become part of a patchwork of small refuges, minor corridors and everyday acts of repair. The garden is not peaceful in the simple sense. It is busy, contested, scented, noisy and alive. The lorikeets argue. The honeyeaters negotiate access. The fairy-wrens hunt through the insects. The rosellas appear and disappear with the flowering. The possums come at dusk. The flying fox arrives from a colony that some people would rather not have nearby. The lemon tree perfumes the air beside me while the eucalyptus feeds animals above me. So I have planted another flowering eucalyptus. This one will flower at a different time of year. That feels like a small adjustment in the rhythm of care. Not just more planting, but more attention to timing. More attention to the gaps between seasons. More attention to who might be hungry when one tree has finished, and another has not yet begun. Perhaps that is what the first tree has taught me. Caring for backyard animals is not about imagining myself as the centre of their world. It is to become more attentive to the world's already unfolding around me. It is to plant, watch, refill, wait and learn. The far corner of the garden is no longer far away. It has become one of the places where relationships happen.
By Brett Allen March 19, 2026
A few years ago, I would never have imagined becoming an ethnographer of the train. But geopolitics has a way of rearranging the mundane. As fuel prices surge, a consequence of unnecessary war in the Middle East and trade wars, all decided in distant corridors of power. The ripple effect has forced me to switch from my car to public transport. From driving the lines, tracing my own routes through the road network insulated in steel and glass, I was thrown in with everyone else.  What I found has become curious. A train line is not simply a route through space. It is a line, physical and imagined, entangled with a multitude of lives, intentions, and temporalities. Knotting together and unravelling at each station along the journey. A student boards at one stop, a shift worker departs at the next, and a consultant opens a laptop three stations later. The line gathers and disperses, gathers and disperses. Each node of the collection station, platform, and carriage doors rounds up and orders human packages. People gather, but they do not meet. They are collected. Sorted. Loaded. Pack away. Arriving at the station or stop, bodies pour out in a slow, uniform current, phones in hand, heads bowed. I couldn’t shake the image of workers leaving the machine in Fritz Lang’s Metropolis . The same shuffling gait. The same downcast eyes. But these aren’t labourers broken by industrial discipline. These are knowledge workers, voluntarily tethered. I began to think of the smartphones as umbilical cords. Unnecessary ones at that. These digital entanglements connect each person to hegemonic entities they can barely name or conceive. Big tech, algorithmic processes, AI, data architectures, concepts that don’t enter the mind of the commuter. So who is nourishing whom in this arrangement? The user feels connected, sustained. The platform extracts attention, data, and behavioural surplus. Both parties believe the other is the dependent. And then there were the laptops. People are already working buried in emails, spreadsheets, Slack messages — before they’d arrived at the office. Whatever happened to the Australian ethos of working to live rather than living to work? That sensibility assumed a clean boundary between labour and leisure, between the office and the beach. The smartphone has erased or weakened that line. Work, rest, and distraction occupy the same device, posture, and glazed expressions. You cannot tell from looking whether someone is answering their manager or scrolling memes. The activity is identical. I noticed all of this because I was reading Tim Ingold’s Life of Lines , a physical book, held in two hands, which, of course, is its own technology of insulation. Ingold distinguishes between the wayfarer, who moves attentively through the world, and the transported person, who is essentially a parcel moved from one destination to another. My fellow commuters had gone further. They were being transported through physical space while simultaneously being transported through digital space. Present in neither. Autonomous in neither. The train line, this thing that entangles us all at different points of time and space, had become merely a conduit, its knots of human meeting pulled tight and never opened. The car windscreen has been replaced by the phone screen. The private cabin has been replaced by the digital bubble. The insulation persists. It just changed the substrate. I looked up from my book and saw lines everywhere. The fixed line of the rail corridor. The invisible lines of the wireless signal. The lines of text on every screen. The lines of force run from Washington to fuel pumps to household budgets to train tickets. And the line I was travelling, entangled with a multitude at different points of time and space, knotting and unknotting at every station. We were all following lines. None of us chose quite where they led. Perhaps the most honest thing I can say is this: I am one of the drones, too. I was reading a book about lines while being carried along one, performing a more prestigious version of exactly what everyone else was doing, absent from the shared space, following a thread of my own. The only difference was the moment I looked up. Maybe that’s enough. The ethnographic instinct isn’t immune to the pattern. It’s the willingness to notice you’re in it.
More Posts